12/27/2022 0 Comments Ios adobe revel![]() The App Store now includes several dozen Flickr apps, but for today’s roundup focuses on apps that provide effective solutions for users who want to access their own photo libraries in the cloud. If nothing else, this makes Flickr an excellent backup service for photos, and there are a wide range of iOS applications enabling a Flickr library to become your iOS devices’ cloud photo storage solution as well. One of Flickr’s original selling points remains its biggest advantage today for the serious photographer with a large library: for the price of an iTunes Match subscription-$25/year-users get unlimited uploading and storage for their photos, including full access to the original files. Even though parent company Yahoo has lost much of its former glory, Flickr remains the 800-pound gorilla in the photo storage and sharing space. Additional problems are created when you consider that downscaled and edited versions wind up scattered between devices, creating multiple variations that may or may not make it back into your master library.įlickr is capable of stepping in to fill some of these gaps. As of now, Apple treats iOS devices as capable of viewing, displaying, and sharing small numbers of specifically-selected photos, which are generally picked from only several supported Windows/Mac management apps, then downsized during synchronization. Instead, this year saw only a modest improvement with the addition of Shared Photo Streams, which will add some value for users who want to quickly and easily share photos stored on their IOS devices, but doesn’t address what happens to their larger, archived photo libraries. ![]() It will be interesting to see where Adobe goes from here.We hoped that WWDC would usher in a rethought Apple photo storage solution that would more effectively place a user’s entire photo library “in the cloud ” last year’s introduction of Photo Stream was a baby step in this direction, but lacked any kind of organization or long-term storage. Revel is a start at addressing this hole in their product line. With all of the talent at Adobe and their unquestioned dominance of the photo editing market, why have they not destroyed competitors in this market. This is the question I really can't answer. ![]() Why hasn't Adobe crushed Flickr and the other online photo services? But with so much competition, I think the free level needs to offer more monthly uploads if they want to attract new members. I could see them offer a version for free with CC, but still offer it to non-subscribers for $5.99 a month.Ĭonsidering all that Revel can do, I think $5.99 a month isn't bad for premium level pricing. So I'm not sure these consumers are going to be excited to pay more money to Adobe, even if it solves a problem for them.Ĭould Adobe offer Revel as part of the Creative Cloud? Maybe. Subscriptions to Creative Cloud include access to all the apps, free fonts, storage, Behance's pro portfolio site and more. Especially designers and web developers that use Creative Cloud apps and are serious photographers, but not professionals.īut Adobe has conditioned these users that everything is now in the Creative Cloud. So where does that leave Revel?Īdd metadata, RAW support and an integrated workflow with the Creative Cloud apps and I think there would be a market within the advanced amateur market. I'm not sure how many consumers will pay $5.99 per month when there are less expensive alternatives. Apple offers Photostream and stores the last 1,000 shots you took. Dropbox offers the Camera Upload feature and expands storage the more you use it. There is absolutely a need for this type of service, but is there a market? Especially at the price? Flickr offers a nice iPhone app and a terabyte of storage for free. Backup and sync is a major issue for these consumers. The goal of Revel is to target people (and families) who take pictures with their phones. (All metadata is preserved and visible if you export the file.) And there are no hooks from Lightroom or Photoshop into Revel. You can't see any keywords or metadata that is attached to the file. ![]() The current version of Revel only supports JPGs, not RAW files. In it's current form, Revel is not intended for same pro audience as Creative Cloud. More than a few folks online have wondered why Revel isn't included in Creative Cloud, but I think the answer is pretty simple. (The free trial for the first month gives you unlimited uploads.) A Revel membership is not included in a Creative Cloud membership. If you are going to seriously use Revel, you'll need to pay $5.99/month for the premium level that includes unlimited uploads. The apps and basic service is free and allows you to upload 50 pictures a month. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |